Draft. Not published, not indexed, and visible only on staging.
Has this NYC building been to housing court?
A property lookup on the apartment you're about to sign for turns up a litigation record. Or a neighbor mentions the building was "in housing court a few years back." Both phrases get used loosely, and the paper trail runs in several directions. A live dispute over conditions, an order forcing people out, a lien sale working through unpaid taxes, and a marshal who has removed a tenant here before are all separate records. Only one of them is rare enough that finding it should change your mind about signing.
The court case is usually the landlord's, not yours
The record most people mean by "housing court" comes from HPD's Housing Litigation Division, which files cases in Housing Court against owners to enforce the state's Multiple Dwelling Law and the city's Housing Maintenance Code. Most of what shows up on the division's docket are Tenant Actions, a tenant's own case asking a judge to order repairs, with HPD in it as a party. The division also brings its own cases, a smaller heat-and-hot-water track and Article 7A, the rare proceeding where a judge lets someone besides the owner collect the rent and spend it on the repairs the owner won't make. A case labeled harassment is usually still just an allegation on the intake form. Of the roughly 241k litigation records HPD has ever carried, only 334 ended in a judge actually finding harassment after an inquest or a trial, against more than 8k where a judge specifically found no harassment took place. The case type on the record is what a tenant alleged. The finding is what happened.
An eviction executed at an address runs the opposite direction. The owner won a separate Housing Court case against a specific tenant, and the marshal who carried out the court's order is an independently appointed city official, not an HPD employee. Roughly 15.5k residential evictions were executed across the five boroughs in 2024 alone, common enough that one on its own says more about how often the city's courts turn over tenants than about this landlord. A live case against the owner right now is the part worth weighing. Whether a marshal has ever visited the address is not.
A vacate order and a tax lien aren't lawsuits
A vacate order is administrative, not litigation. No lawsuit comes first. HPD can order occupants out of all or part of a building for a hazard that is dangerous right now, most often fire damage, sometimes a habitability condition nobody has fixed. FDNY keeps a separate, much smaller list of its own for a live fire or safety hazard. An order sits open until the agency rescinds it, and right now 4,522 of the 8,874 HPD vacate orders ever issued remain open, roughly half. About half of them have never been rescinded on the record, which is a mix of buildings nobody has cleared to reoccupy and orders nobody ever went back to close out. On the building in front of you, the date on the order is what tells you which.
A tax lien notice is further still from a housing complaint. It comes from the Department of Finance, and lists properties behind on taxes or water and sewer charges, moving through 90-, 60-, 30- and 10-day notice stages toward a lien sale, where the debt gets sold to a private buyer who can eventually foreclose. In the most recently completed cycle, about 30k properties got a first notice and 4,545 were still on the list when it reached the final sale stage. Roughly six in seven come off the list somewhere in between, most often because the bill got paid or a payment plan got signed, sometimes because the property qualified out of the sale entirely. A property on the notice list reflects a landlord behind on a payment, and most of them catch up.
How common a pending case actually is
None of that says whether a live case is normal for a building this size, which is the question a search box can't answer and a records list can't either. Reading HPD's Housing Litigation Division data against every residential tax lot in the city, as of early September 2026: 5,418 residential buildings, out of roughly 768k residential tax lots citywide, currently carry at least one case with a status of PENDING or APPLICATION PENDING.
| Building size | Residential lots | Share with a pending case |
|---|---|---|
| 1-2 units | 595k | 0.1% |
| 3-5 units | 104k | 0.6% |
| 6-19 units | 41k | 3.2% |
| 20-99 units | 23k | 9.6% |
| 100+ units | 4,625 | 12.3% |
A pending case gets more common as a building gets bigger, the reverse of the pattern with open housing-maintenance violations, where mid-size buildings run the worst rate. The mechanism is simple: a Tenant Action needs a tenant willing to sue. A hundred-unit building offers a hundred tenants who might be that person. A two-family offers two. Below six units a pending case is rare, well under 1%, so finding one on a small building is worth reading closely. At 100 or more units, roughly one in eight carries a case, which makes one pending action closer to background noise for a building that size. The median count is the same across every size band once a building has any case at all: one.
That "pending" label is also not as fresh as it sounds. About 80% of the currently pending cases were opened in 2024 or later, but 407 have sat open since before 2020, some dating back to the mid-2000s. A case that old is usually a filing nobody closed out rather than an active dispute, so when it was filed matters as much as its status.
What to do with all four
Each record answers a different question, and a vacate order still open is the only one rare enough to be the whole answer by itself. Weigh a pending HPD case by what it alleges and how old it is, especially on a small building where having one at all is unusual. Read a tax lien notice as the landlord's bill rather than the unit's condition, since most properties on that list clear it. A past eviction, tens of thousands a year citywide, is ordinary enough that one alone tells you little.
Look up the building's address to see all four on one page, current HPD case status, vacate orders, tax lien notices and past evictions, next to the open violation history that's the more common everyday signal. And because a mid-size building is where a live case is least unusual, who owns it is worth checking alongside the case itself, since size predicts a landlord's record better than the name on the deed does.